The 1-10-100 Rule of Quality Costs
Spending $1 in Prevention prevents $10 in factory rework (Internal Failure) and $100 in customer warranty or field recalls (External Failure).
Quantify financial losses caused by defects and build a rigorous business case for Six Sigma projects.
Client-Side Privacy Guarantee
The data you enter is processed in your browser and is not uploaded. Ads and analytics are provided by Google separately.
What is the Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) and the PAF Model?
The PAF model categorizes quality costs into four distinct buckets: Prevention Costs (Design, Training) + Appraisal Costs (Inspection, Testing) + Internal Failure (Scrap, Rework) + External Failure (Recalls, Warranties). In traditional companies, COPQ represents 15% to 25% of annual revenue; Six Sigma companies reduce this to under 5%.
Spending $1 in Prevention prevents $10 in factory rework (Internal Failure) and $100 in customer warranty or field recalls (External Failure).
Isolate the vital few quality defects or downtime causes from the trivial many.
Process Capability & Measurement (MSA)Translate defect counts and multi-step process yields into standardized Six Sigma quality levels.
Problem Solving & ImprovementEstablish clear project governance and executive sponsorship before embarking on Six Sigma improvement projects.